mystic and poet, who used revolving discs to illustrate his complex
philosophy. Other early movable
books included anatomical studies, where pages could be flipped to
reveal internal organs. In the early
nineteenth century, movable books
entered the emerging field of juvenile literature, and the illustrated
examples on this site date from
this time to the late twentieth century. Highlighted are artists/paper
engineers Voitech Kubasta, Robert
Sabuda, Brian Wildsmith, Jan Pien-kowski’s Robot, and Gary Greenberg’s The Pop-up Book of Phobias,
among others.
Many of the examples on this
site are animated; there are paper
dolls that don different outfits with
a click of the mouse, flip books,
tabbed scenes, pictures that dissolve
and transform through a sort of
Venetian blind technique, overlays,
three-dimensional pop-ups, and a
short video clip.
After perusing the examples on
this site, visit artist Robert Sabuda’s
website ( www.robertsabuda.com)
to find a bibliography, learn some
simple pop-up techniques, and see
examples from all over the world.
—Rebecca Arkenberg is a museum consultant from Stratford, Connecticut.
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
t
u
d
i
o
L
e
s
s
o
n
Spaces
Ken Vieth
Haveyouevernoticedhow qualityofspirit- justa wordortwocangrab uality. Theidea yourattention? Youcan intriguedme, yet Idid thenthinkaboutthose notactonituntilthisyear,
wordsanddevelopthemintoacon- aftermyretirement, whenalocal contentsoftheinteriorspace.
ceptworthinvestigating.Aboutten highschoolartteacherkindlypro- Thegoalofthisprocessistohave
yearsago,acolleagueofminesug- videdmetheopportunitytowork studentscreateaplacetoremind
gestedtheideaofcreating“sacred withherstudentsforthreeweeks themofwhattheymostvaluein
spaces.”Hefeltthatthisideamight tofullydeveloptheideaofsacred life,aplacewheretheyarevalued,
offermyart spaces. andaplacethatrepresentsasanctu-studentsa aryfromlife’sstressfulsituations.
T
h
e
g
o
a
l
o
f
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
rewarding SacredSpaces
i
s
t
o
h
a
v
e
s
t
u
d
e
n
t
s
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
challenge. Inthisinvestiga- Process
p
l
a
c
e
t
o
r
e
m
i
n
d
t
h
e
m
o
f
Aftersome tion,students Studentsbeginwithanoverviewof
w
h
a
t
t
h
e
y
m
o
s
t
v
a
l
u
e
i
n
l
i
f
e
,
thought,I createathree- thequalitiesoftraditionalspaces
realizedthis dimensional suchaschurches,synagogues,and
a
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
a
t
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
s
a
wasanoppor- structureusing temples,includingNotreDame
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
s
a
n
c
t
u
a
r
y
f
r
o
m
l
i
f
e
’
s
tunitytolook simplenatural CathedralinParisandBuddhist
s
t
r
e
s
s
f
u
l
s
i
t
u
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
atstructure, roundreedand templesinKyoto,Japan.Tobroaden
makeaper- paperthatrepre- students’understandingofcon-sonalconnectionthroughsymbol- sentsapersonalyetsymbolicsacred temporaryarchitectsandarchitec-ism, producegreaterunderstanding, space. Thestructureistobevisually ture, wealsodiscussthe workof
andarticulatea obscureontheexterior,yet,when CanadianarchitectFrankGehry,
hungfromtheceiling,itrevealsthe Americanarchitect Frank Lloyd
30 SchoolArts November2007
Continued from page 27.
reflecting the students’ generated
information and images.
Students can apply their own
drawings, watercolors, manipulated
photocopies of selected images,
color transparencies from photographs, and manipulated computer
images that they have scanned. The
repetition of images or colors is
important for visual continuity and
a strong overall design.
Teacher Observations
Organization of materials and
focused instructional content are
important in order to maintain the
time frame of this project. Work
was suspended from the ceiling for
daily storage, as well as in the final
exhibition space, so that both the
interior and exterior can be viewed.
Evaluation
Evaluation includes teacher and
student daily critique. The work
is viewed in terms of artistry, cre-
ativity, and effort. Effort includes
focused time on task each day in
class, and creative effort to develop
a unique, well-constructed struc-
ture.
Student Self-Assessment
Have students answer the following questions on a piece of paper
or prepared handout. Consider all
answers to be confidential unless
the student chooses to share:
• How well, from a material perspective, is your sculpture created?
• How well, from the concept of
a “sacred space,” is your work
developed and articulated?
• Can others get a richer sense of
who you are symbolically? How
and why?
• Have you created a place that
represents a personal retreat or
sanctuary for you? How?
Conclusion
Though this was a challenging
concept to explore, I was pleased to
discover that students on the high
school level did embrace this opportunity, created varied structures,
and gained insight into themselves.
So often we underestimate the ability of students to delve deeply into
a concept and produce meaningful
work. We can be focused on teaching the elements and principles of
art and design, yet, in reality, it is
how students apply these in dramatic ways that inspires meaning
in their work. The power of believing in your students’ potential
should not be underestimated.
Special thanks to Karen Rosen-burg, New Hope Solbury Public
High School, New Hope, Pennsylvania, for allowing me to work with
her and her students. Also, heartfelt
thanks to my friend Dan Bush who
videotaped this project so it could
be shared with art educators in the
future. Dan’s video work of my previous high school projects is available through Davis Publications
( www.davisart.com).
Ken Vieth is the author of From Ordinary
to Extraordinary and Engaging the Adolescent Mind, and coauthor of The Visual
Experience, all published by Davis Publications. kvieth@crusoe.net
NATIONAL STANDARDS
Students create multiple solutions
to specific visual arts problems that
demonstrate competence in producing effective relationships between
structural choices and artistic functions.
WEB LINKS
www.franklloydwright.org
www.greatbuildings.com/archi-tects/ Frank_Gehry.html
www.calatrava.com
www.greatbuildings.com/archi-tects/ Jorn_Utzon.html